Of limited interest to most…

I’m enjoying the comment thread on this post at Oiler’s Nation. A brief synopsis:

  • Local sports radio host posts grab-bag article covering a number of topics
  • Commenter politely suggests that the part of the article regarding the waiver eligibility of several players is wrong
  • Local sports radio host acts like a junior high student (complete with age-appropriate punctuation, or lack thereof) in responding to said criticism, including Arguments from Authority, ad hominems, and the ever-popular “Can’t you guys read. [sic]”
  • Commenters (one of whom is a lawyer) lay a courteous, fact-based beatdown on said petulant radio host, quoting the Collective Bargaining Agreement and providing examples. Turns out they can read after all, huh? (They can spell and punctuate, too!)

Like I said, of limited interest, but an interesting example of its type.

UPDATE: It’s just gotten even better. If you close your eyes you can almost hear the pitter patter of rage spittle hitting the keyboard. Pro-tip: When you’re being criticized for being unprofessional, it is unhelpful to dredge up a non-sequitur, long-forgotten incident in which you were accused of plagiarism.

.:

5 Responses to “Of limited interest to most…”

  1. Ignatius Pig Says:

    I just read the article and the comments. And you’re right on, it’s quite funny. I love the whole 7 games / 11 games argument.

    But you’re wrong that it’s only of limited interest. I’m 100% sure cause I talked to Rick about it just last week.

  2. Krankor Says:

    YOU ARE WRONG

  3. Ignatius Pig Says:

    What? I’ve got this right. Can’t you guys read.

  4. Sports Radio Guy Says:

    I trust the guy who talked to the guy who should know a lot more than I trust the the guy who posts detailed proof. “Evidence” and “reasoned debate” are for pussies who don’t know to believe what they’re told by talk radio hosts.

  5. sporkless Says:

    That was pretty awesome. I love MSM blowhards who know jack.